Mortgage fraud allegations have hit Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, and she’s fighting back by hiring Abbe Lowell, Hunter Biden’s former attorney. The mortgage fraud case centers on accusations that Cook falsified bank documents and property records to secure better loan terms, prompting President Trump to attempt firing her from the Fed.
Also Read: SEC Reviews First-Ever Staked Injective ETF From Canary
Lisa Cook Battles Trump Federal Government As Abbe Lowell Mortgage Fight Builds
The mortgage fraud controversy erupted when Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte accused Lisa Cook of mortgage fraud through a criminal referral to Attorney General Pam Bondi. The Trump federal government acted quickly on these allegations, with Trump issuing a termination letter citing the Abbe Lowell mortgage case as grounds for dismissal.
Pulte alleged that Cook designated a condo in Atlanta as her primary residence in July 2021, just two weeks after taking a loan on her Michigan home, which she also declared as her primary residence.
Abbe Lowell Challenges Mortgage Fraud Firing
Abbe Lowell stepped in immediately to defend Cook against the mortgage fraud allegations. The high-profile attorney who previously represented Hunter Biden now faces another politically charged case involving the trump federal government.
Lowell stated:
“President Trump has no authority to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. His attempt to fire her, based solely on a referral letter, lacks any factual or legal basis. We will be filing a lawsuit challenging this illegal action.”
Right now, Abbe Lowell is preparing legal challenges while Cook refuses to resign despite the mortgage fraud accusations.
Federal Reserve Defends Against Mortgage Fraud Claims
The Federal Reserve pushed back against the mortgage fraud firing, emphasizing that Lisa Cook serves under legal protections. A Federal Reserve spokesperson had this to say:
“Congress, through the Federal Reserve Act, directs that governors serve in long, fixed terms and may be removed by the president only ‘for cause.’ Long tenures and removal protections for governors serve as a vital safeguard, ensuring that monetary policy decisions are based on data, economic analysis, and the long-term interests of the American people.”
Cook herself responded to the mortgage fraud allegations and firing attempt. Lisa Cook stated:
“President Trump purported to fire me ‘for cause’ when no cause exists under the law, and he has no authority to do so. I will not resign.”
Political Response to Mortgage Fraud Case
The Abbe Lowell mortgage defense has drawn political support, with Democrats calling Trump’s actions an overreach. Sen. Elizabeth Warren criticized the mortgage fraud firing attempt. Warren stated:
“The illegal attempt to fire Lisa Cook is the latest example of a desperate President searching for a scapegoat to cover for his own failure to lower costs for Americans. It’s an authoritarian power grab that blatantly violates the Federal Reserve Act, and must be overturned in court.”
Meanwhile, Pulte applauded Trump’s response to the mortgage fraud allegations. He thanked the president’s “commitment to stopping mortgage fraud and following the law” in a social media post.
Market Impact of Mortgage Fraud Battle
The issue of mortgage fraud has already impacted the financial markets with the ICE US dollar dropping 0.3 after Trump fired Cook. The bond yields also hit lower levels as investors digested the Lisa Cook mortgage fraud story and what it means to Federal Reserve independence.
Raymond James analyst Edward Mills said that this activity was an historic one. It indicated the increasing pressure the White House was bringing to bear on the policymaking at the central bank level.
Also Read: IRS Stimulus Checks Eligibility in 2025: Who Qualifies & How to Track
Even more significant is the Abbe Lowell legal challenge which is expected to challenge presidential control over the Fed governors, and where the mortgage fraud case will serve as precedence to future tensions between the Donald Trump federal government and independent regulatory bodies. Both the independence of the Federal Reserve and the role of Lisa Cook is at stake as this legal battle takes place.